Hi Hendrik and all, "Brockhaus, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockh...@siemens.com> writes:
> The point here is, does the group support Mohits draft on specify CoAP > transport for CMP. > > > > Just to recap the discussion from IETF 108: As draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile already is something a working group in the IETF has decided to spend cycles on, the question whether or not CMPv2 is something to work on already seems decided. Given that, after a quick look at draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport, I do not see a reason why not to adopt this as well. I was a bit surprised that you have selected the ACE working group for this. One thing that might get in our way when doing this in ACE is the emerging input for draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile. But otherwise, I do not see a strong reason for not adopting draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport. Grüße Olaf _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
