Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-38: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I share Eric V's concern about the apparently stale nature of the shepherd writeup. It seems to be a common oversight lately. I also agree with Eric about Section 3. Nicely done. Since I'm getting to this document last in our queue this week, I find I have little to contribute here that my colleagues didn't already include in their positions, save this one gem: Section 8.2 should probably say explicitly that the registration should refer to this document, since that is a column of the registry to which you are adding an entry. _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
