I am strongly minded to suggest a spinning plates model of security. Remember the vaudeville act with plates spinning on a stick, the performer gets one, two, five, ten going. And each time he adds a plate they have to go back to give one of the plates he started earlier another push.
Well... I think this is at the very limit of the number of plates I can spin. On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:57 PM Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Phillip for the review. > > Yours, > Daniel > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:41 PM Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker >> Review result: Ready >> >> This draft was previously reviewed by Steve Kent for the -27 version. My >> review >> therefore mostly consists of checking that the changes recommended have >> been >> made and that no new issues have arisen. Note that contrary to the data >> in the >> tracker, I was not given the assignment in 2019. >> >> If you decide that you want to use OAUTH for authorization security for >> Internet of Things, this is a reasonable approach to take. This is not a >> simple >> proposition or for the fainthearted. OAuth is built around the various >> constraints of the browser world to which the constraints of being a >> constrained device are added. >> >> The issues raised by Steve have all been addressed as far as I can see. It >> looks good to go but since it is a security spec, ADs should still take >> note. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ace mailing list >> Ace@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace >> > > > -- > Daniel Migault > Ericsson > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
