On 2021-11-04, at 15:08, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > I think IESG should send any (D)TLS 1.2 only drafts back to the WGs from now > on.
Since you made this comment on an approved document (which the IESG no longer gets to “send back”), I’m not sure I understand what you are trying to say, but I don’t agree with any of the possible interpretations. > A lot of SDOs and industries are working hard on updating all (D)TLS > applications to work also with 1.3. The last thing the world needs is more > 1.2 only standards. I don’t think we need to form a queue behind the completion of DTLS 1.3. This apparently will take some more time: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C321 2021-10-18: Received email from Eric Rescorla that an open technical issue is ongoing. However, we should already have been working on a -bis for the DTLS profile that also supports DTLS 1.3; I can certainly agree with that. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
