On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:27:49AM +0000, Cigdem Sengul wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 at 09:31, Lars Eggert via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Found terminology that should be reviewed for inclusivity; see
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/part2/#inclusive_language for background and
> > more
> > guidance:
> >
> >  * Term "master"; alternatives might be "active", "central", "initiator",
> >    "leader", "main", "orchestrator", "parent", "primary", "server".
> >
> 
> [CS:  I would like to indeed avoid this work, but it appears as a result of
> using "Extended Master Secret".
>  Has this been replaced with an alternative?]

It looks like it's in the process of being renamed to
"extended_main_secret" (per draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis, work-in-progress).

-Ben

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to