The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9482,
"Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Transfer for the Certificate 
Management Protocol".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8523

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: David von Oheimb <[email protected]>

Section: 2

Original Text
-------------
PKIMessages

Corrected Text
--------------
PKIMessage structures

Notes
-----
This pertains to all three occurrences of the word "PKIMessages" in sections 2, 
2.3, and 2.5.

"PKIMessages" can be misinterpreted as the ASN.1 type "PKIMessages", defined as:

    PKIMessages ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF PKIMessage

Yet what is meant in all three occurrences in this RFC is simply: PKIMessage 
structures 
(i.e., one ore more structures of type PKIMessage), not a list/sequence of 
PKIMessage.

Note: The same disambiguation has already been done in RFC 9811 
(as mentioned in 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis/10/).

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC9482 (draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Transfer for the 
Certificate Management Protocol
Publication Date    : November 2023
Author(s)           : M. Sahni, Ed., S. Tripathi, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Authentication and Authorization for Constrained 
Environments
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to