Ben, > Option one is preferable in the likely case most people would use the > DAO authentication provider package. In fact I've not heard of anyone > using Acegi Security with anything but the DAO authentication provider > package. Furthermore, the linkage is not very significant anyway, being > only a single interface which could be moved to net.sf.acegisecurity to > reflect its more widespread use.
Option 1 would work fine for my case...but I could also survive with option 3 if you think option 1 would compromise the architecture in an unfavorable manner. :) Mike --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
