I'll take care of that

On 5/30/06, Ray Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we get the maven repos updated?
> Right now mvn compile fails because
> "org.acegisecurity:acegi-security-parent:pom:1.0.0" cannot be
> downloaded.
>
> On 5/30/06, Mark St.Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > The configuration was referencing "net.sf"... some of the config was
> > moved over to "org." however not all. Including the userdetails
> > refactoring. Plus some of the JSPs were also referencing "net.sf" in
> > page imports.
> >
> > I am running through and testing the app right now, currently failing
> > on a call to getPrincipal from User object... I will fix it up, retest
> > it, run the unit testing and check in the changes.
> >
> > Re: the tutorial app... yeah I noticed that .. very nice... much more
> > concise config.
> >
> > I am usng Spring 2.0 and I am really digging the schema-based config...
> >
> > I am also using MethodSecurityInterceptors using the new Aspect pointcuts.
> > Not sure if we should also include examples of usage using Spring 2.0?
> > I assume we need to wait for it to go final.
> >
> > Uri is on it...Great, I'll keep my eyes posted for <acegi:config>  :)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Mark
> >
> > On 5/30/06, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mark St.Godard wrote:
> > > > Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample project,
> > > > I noticed it was not converted over.  I will create an JIRA entry for
> > > > myself and update this tomorow.
> > > >
> > > I just checked and it looked to me like it was built for 1.0.0. What
> > > specifically wasn't converted?
> > >
> > > > Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for
> > > > namespace handlers, XSD support, etc..
> > > >
> > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-271 for those
> > > interested.
> > >
> > > > If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up...
> > > > its something that I would really like to get in...  and reduce some
> > > > of the XML verbosity.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Uri Boness has volunteered, but I'm unsure whether work has commenced. I
> > > am happy for anyone to take a look at it who has sufficient time.
> > >
> > > As for verbose XML, I'd encourage people to take a look at the new
> > > tutorial sample, which is just 148 lines of XML. This includes comments,
> > > whitespace and full support for form authentication, remember-me,
> > > anonymous and web request authorization. I think that's a pretty good
> > > base given the features, but nevertheless it will be even less with
> > > SEC-271 improvements.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Ben
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org
> > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
> > > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Home: http://acegisecurity.org
> > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
> > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Home: http://acegisecurity.org
> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
>


-- 
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride


_______________________________________________
Home: http://acegisecurity.org
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer

Reply via email to