Dealing with JOSE nuances is not germane to this WG. Yes, JOSE has failings -- pretty much all of which were pointed out during the JOSE WG process, and dismissed at the time. They are not so bad, however, as to render JOSE as-is unusable. Certainly the cure described in draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options is much worse than the disease. Either let's scrap JOSE and re-design more cleanly, or let's just use it with the flaws it has.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <ph...@hallambaker.com> wrote: > Another point I think should be considered on the agenda is how to use JOSE > in the spec. > > I think it would be a very good idea to adopt the approach Mike Jones and > myself have been suggesting of using JOSE without base64 armoring for > authenticating requests and responses at the Web Service level. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00 > > > I really hope that ACME is not going to be the last JSON based security spec > IETF does and I would really like all the specs to end up with something > approaching a uniform style. > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Ted Hardie <ted.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just to bump this up on people's lists, Rich and I will put up a >> preliminary agenda next Monday. If you want time for something other than >> draft-barnes-acme, please let us know. >> >> thanks, >> >> Ted and Rich >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Howdy, >>> >>> As you've seen from the IESG announcement, ACME has been approved as a >>> working group, so our meeting in Prague will be as a working group rather >>> than a BoF. The IETF agenda is still tentative, but we're currently >>> scheduled for Thursday, July 23rd, 15:20-17:20, in Karlin I/II. (There is >>> still a chance that will change, though, so please do not tailor travel to >>> just that time frame!) >>> >>> Our charter lists draft-barnes-acme as a starting point, and Rich and I >>> are asking the authors to produce an update for the meeting. We expect some >>> of the working group time in Prague to be a document review/discussion of >>> that draft. >>> >>> If you have other agenda items you'd like to request time for, please >>> send them to the list. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> Ted and Rich >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> Acme@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
