On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:22:39PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > Last month we called for consensus on this, and one person asked for more > time. > > As co-chair, if there are no objections raised, and discussion > started, by next week, we’ll declare that the WG is in at least rough > consensus on this issue.
I potentially had more to say on this, but I figured I'd wait on that until Jacob was back from vacation and had shared his view on where he thought we were currently at with the concerns we'd been discussing. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
