I put the time period as six weeks, which takes us to just around IETF-98...
PLEASE reply on list if you will review and/or are interested in working on interop. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies Member, OpenSSL Dev Team IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz -----Original Message----- From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:26 PM To: draft-ietf-acme-a...@ietf.org; acme-cha...@ietf.org Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-acme-acme The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-acme-acme has been changed to "In WG Last Call" from "WG Document" by Rich Salz: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-acme/ Comment: As we agreed at IETF-97 (Seoul), we will have a slightly longer WGLC period to encourage implementations and interop. Are there any volunteers to read and review this document? Please post to acme@ietf.org. Does anyone have an implementation in progress and would be interested in doing interop at the IETF Hackathon at IETF-98 in Chicago? Please post to acme@ietf.org _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
