On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:03:14PM -0700, Roland Shoemaker wrote: > One thing that I forgot to bring up during the meeting was an issue > that was brought up with regards to the order in which the ACME-TLS-ALPN > and ACME-IP drafts are standardized. ACME-IP defines how to use IP > addresses with existing challenges and we’d like to include guidance > on how to do so with TLS-ALPN, but (as far as I’m aware) we are unable > to reference IDs in RFCs so we cannot directly reference > draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn
This is incorrect. IDs can normatively reference other IDs, if there is a "plan" on getting the referenced ID ready to be published. If needed, the referencing draft waits for the referenced one in RFC-Editor queue. So I think the easiest way is to just have normative reference ACME-IP -> TLS-ALPN. -Ilari _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
