Since the document includes:

        id-pe-acmeIdentifier OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  { id-pe 31 }

I have asked IANA to make this assignment.  It made this request to avoid a 
future conflict.

I do not see any value in another table subordinate to this value.

Russ

> On Aug 14, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Roland Shoemaker <rol...@letsencrypt.org> wrote:
> 
> The decision to format the OID this way was an early one that I’m not 
> completely attached to. That said the existing solution does still feel 
> cleaner to me than doing the versioning directly under id-pe. Given it’s 
> unlikely that the version with be incremented by anything other than a 
> document from the ACME WG, and that doing so is likely to deprecate the 
> existing version it seems more prudent to me (from a inexperienced position 
> admittedly) for this WG to manage the assignments of the versioned OIDs under 
> the id-pe-acmeIdentifier arc rather than have to defer to the registration to 
> the SMI numbers registry.
> 
> With that said if there is WG consensus to move to this suggested version I’m 
> happy to oblige and move forward with it.
> 
>> On Aug 14, 2018, at 12:00 PM, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This document include a particular object identifier, and IANA has not 
>> assigned it yet.  Please do not assume that you will get the next available 
>> number.  Someone else could get there before you.
>> 
>> This document uses the following syntax for the certificate extension:
>> 
>>      id-pe-acmeIdentifier OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  { id-pe 31 }
>> 
>>      id-pe-acmeIdentifier-v1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  { id-pe-acmeIdentifier 1 
>> }
>> 
>>      acmeValidation-v1 ::= OCTET STRING (SIZE (32))
>> 
>> I see no reason for the middle value.  This would cause the creation os an 
>> additional table for IANA to maintain.
>> 
>> Instead, I suggest using  { id-pe 31 } directly for the certificate 
>> extension.  If a v2 is needed in the future, another number from this same 
>> object identifier arc can be assigned for it.
>> 
>> Russ
>> (The IANA Expert for the SMI Security for PKIX Certificate Extension 
>> registry)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> Acme@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to