This version incorporates the feedback from the IESG, most notably moving
from to GET to POST-as-GET.

Chairs / ADs - Where to from here?

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote:

> This version incorporates the feedback from the IESG, most notably moving
> from to GET to POST-as-GET.
>
> Chairs / ADs - Where to from here?
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:50 PM <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-acme-acme-15.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Richard Barnes and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:           draft-ietf-acme-acme
>> Revision:       15
>> Title:          Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
>> Document date:  2018-09-25
>> Group:          acme
>> Pages:          89
>> URL:
>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-acme-acme-15.txt
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-acme/
>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-acme-15
>> Htmlized:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-acme-acme
>> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-acme-15
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    Public Key Infrastructure X.509 (PKIX) certificates are used for a
>>    number of purposes, the most significant of which is the
>>    authentication of domain names.  Thus, certification authorities
>>    (CAs) in the Web PKI are trusted to verify that an applicant for a
>>    certificate legitimately represents the domain name(s) in the
>>    certificate.  Today, this verification is done through a collection
>>    of ad hoc mechanisms.  This document describes a protocol that a CA
>>    and an applicant can use to automate the process of verification and
>>    certificate issuance.  The protocol also provides facilities for
>>    other certificate management functions, such as certificate
>>    revocation.
>>
>>    RFC EDITOR: PLEASE REMOVE THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH: The source for
>>    this draft is maintained in GitHub.  Suggested changes should be
>>    submitted as pull requests at https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme
>>    [1].  Instructions are on that page as well.  Editorial changes can
>>    be managed in GitHub, but any substantive change should be discussed
>>    on the ACME mailing list (acme@ietf.org).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to