Thanks for your review, Adam! On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 15:11 Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote:
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-acme-acme-16: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-acme/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for all the work that everyone has put into this protocol, and > especially for the work that went into addressing the privacy issue that I > identified. I'm excited by what ACME been able to do for the certificate > issuance sector as a whole, and truly appreciate all of the early > implementors > who have put both clients and servers into active production. > > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
