Thanks for your review, Adam!

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 15:11 Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-acme-acme-16: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-acme/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for all the work that everyone has put into this protocol, and
> especially for the work that went into addressing the privacy issue that I
> identified. I'm excited by what ACME been able to do for the certificate
> issuance sector as a whole, and truly appreciate all of the early
> implementors
> who have put both clients and servers into active production.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to