Starting work on the champagne & ticker-tape slide for the meeting.

Thanks everyone for all the work.

> On 11 Mar 2019, at 23:44, Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote:
> 
> Thanks to everyone for your work on this!  
> 
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 5:08 PM <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org 
> <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>> wrote:
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>         RFC 8555
> 
>         Title:      Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) 
>         Author:     R. Barnes,
>                     J. Hoffman-Andrews,
>                     D. McCarney, 
>                     J. Kasten
>         Status:     Standards Track
>         Stream:     IETF
>         Date:       March 2019
>         Mailbox:    r...@ipv.sx, 
>                     j...@eff.org <mailto:j...@eff.org>, 
>                     c...@letsencrypt.org <mailto:c...@letsencrypt.org>,
>                     jdkas...@umich.edu <mailto:jdkas...@umich.edu>
>         Pages:      95
>         Characters: 196903
>         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-acme-acme-18.txt
> 
>         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8555 
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8555>
> 
>         DOI:        10.17487/RFC8555
> 
> Public Key Infrastructure using X.509 (PKIX) certificates are used
> for a number of purposes, the most significant of which is the
> authentication of domain names.  Thus, certification authorities
> (CAs) in the Web PKI are trusted to verify that an applicant for a
> certificate legitimately represents the domain name(s) in the
> certificate.  As of this writing, this verification is done through a
> collection of ad hoc mechanisms.  This document describes a protocol
> that a CA and an applicant can use to automate the process of
> verification and certificate issuance.  The protocol also provides
> facilities for other certificate management functions, such as
> certificate revocation.
> 
> This document is a product of the Automated Certificate Management 
> Environment Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> This is now a Proposed Standard.
> 
> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
> protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
> for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
> Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards 
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards>) for the 
> standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
> memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>
>   https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist 
> <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search 
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/search>
> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk 
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk>
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org 
> <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org <mailto:Acme@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to