On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:18 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> I ommited your great explanation of the situation. > *I* think that certificates bound to IP addresses are useful for things > like > server management systems (Dell DRACs, HP iLO, IBM RSA..). As such, there > are no cloud issues involved. I’m a bit confused by understanding how this bit fits into the discussion. Is the concern that the draft-acme-ip would not work for these cases, and/or that the choice and use of TLS-ALPN (or another identifier) would preclude addressing these use cases? It seems that the applicability of the protocol satisfies all of these use cases, including internal CAs. Have I overlooked a concern with respect to SNI and ALPN? >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
