Hi, all
We are putting together the agenda for IETF 105.
The current plan is to have presentation and agenda time for email and for
telephony.
There is still time on the agenda to cover more topics, so if you think they
should be brought up, please reply either to this thread, or directly to Rich
and me:
draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn seems to be stalled for months. We’ve had a change of
AD and a new AD review ([1]). Can allocating meeting time help with progressing
this?
draft-ietf-acme-star is in IETF LC with no significant issues having come up.
Unless the authors think otherwise, I don’t see a need to allocate agenda time
at this point.
draft-ietf-acme-ip is waiting for an AD write-up and to progress it. Unless
Roland feels differently, I don’t think there’s much to spend agenda time on.
draft-ietf-acme-caa is in the RFC editor’s queue. So, all good?
If you have some other business for the WG meeting, please bring it up now.
Thanks
Rich & Yoav
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/YW9rho7i1YjLd32k-MDYX4p2dSU
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
