Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-star-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-star/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. While I am balloting "no objection", I support Alexey's DISCUSS. I am also wondering what is the impact of the increased rate of request to the ACME server. While sections 4 and 5 answered most of the questions popping up in my mind when reading the document; I am still concerned that going from a 90 days to a 3 days validity is probably multiplying the load by 30 on ACME server, are the free existing ACME server ready to continue their free services? Regards, -éric _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
