All,
This latest update to the DTN Node ID validation draft should resolve all
of the AD comments *except* for this document updating a document from a
different WG. The discrepancy in BPv7 (not) using admin record type IANA
registry can be pulled out of this ACME document and made into its own
separate DTN WG draft. But that would need to be a normative reference of
this document and I didn't want to make big structural changes with the
other edits.

Part of this update is a change in the related DTN/BP PKIX profile (from
TCPCLv4) to avoid using SAN URI and instead use a SAN otherName form
specific to bundle EID content. The logic on the ACME side is otherwise the
same, just with a different identifier name and its associated PKIX claim
source. I still see a couple of vestigial mentions of "URI" that need to be
replaced for consistency.

Please let me know if there are any other issues to discuss before the next
interim,
Brian S.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:19 AM <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Automated Certificate Management
> Environment WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Automated Certificate Management Environment
> (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension
>         Author          : Brian Sipos
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-05.txt
>         Pages           : 29
>         Date            : 2021-09-22
>
> Abstract:
>    This document specifies an extension to the Automated Certificate
>    Management Environment (ACME) protocol which allows an ACME server to
>    validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID for an ACME
>    client.  The DTN Node ID is encoded as a certificate Subject
>    Alternative Name (SAN) of type otherName with a name form of
>    "bundleEID" and as an ACME Identifier type "bundleEID".
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-05.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-05
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to