Thanks for the re-review Linda. ACME WG: here is the thread from the IETF LC where proposed changes were discussed: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/nujBgHd6ZKHY6fG58ZWBKzFGVWs/
> -----Original Message----- > From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 6:55 PM > To: ops-...@ietf.org > Cc: acme@ietf.org; draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid....@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org > Subject: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10 > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Has Issues > > I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors. > Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any > other last call comments. > > This document specifies an extension to ACME protocol which allows an ACME > server to validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking Node ID for an ACME client. > > I had the following comments for the -07 version. I don't think the latest > version (-10) resolved my comments. > > Issues: > > The document didn't describe how the Node ID described in this document is > related to the Delay Tolerant Network. I see the mechanism can be equally > used in any network. What are the specifics related to the "Delay Tolerant > Network"? > It would be helpful if the document adds a paragraph explaining the specific > characteristics of the Delay-Tolerant Network that require the additional > parameters/types used for validating the Node-ID for an ACME client. > > Thank you, > > Linda Dunbar > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
