Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org> wrote:
> On process: if this document will be published as Proposed Standard, it
> will need to be taken out of IESG Evaluation, confirmed in the WG
> (done), sent for a second IETF LC, and returned for another IETF
> review.
> Please let me know if the upcoming -14 will be the right version to
> re-run the steps.
Hi, yes, -14 just posted, and I think it's ready for those steps.
Three changes: 1) Rifaat has changed affliation, 2) Pledge: defined, 3)
Status changes to standards track.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
