Agreed. Especially because the "newAuthz" resource is optional, this omission seems minor. I would accept as an editorial erratum.
Aaron On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 4:03 AM Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: > This errata also had no responses. In this case, I'd suggest rejecting > it, or making it editorial. I don't think it affects how anyone would > implement or interpret the RFC. But again, I'd like confirmation (or > correction). > > Deb > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:19 AM RFC Errata System < > rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555, >> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6103 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Theodor Nolte <no...@dfn-cert.de> >> >> Section: 7.1. >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> o A "newAccount" resource (Section 7.3) >> >> o A "newOrder" resource (Section 7.4) >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> o A "newAccount" resource (Section 7.3) >> >> o A "newAuthz" resource (Section 7.4) >> >> o A "newOrder" resource (Section 7.4) >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The item for the "newAuthz" resource is missing in the list of resources. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) >> Publication Date : March 2019 >> Author(s) : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. >> Kasten >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Automated Certificate Management Environment >> Area : Security >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> Acme@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
