Apologies for letting the draft expire. I've recently switched roles within Google and have been busy ramping up. My new team is responsible for Android Key Attestation[0], one of the attestation schemes included in the draft, which hopefully allows me to build a production implementation of the draft.
I've incorporated one change from Thomas and updated the draft to version 2[1]. There hasn’t been much feedback on the draft during the ACME sessions or on the mailing list, especially from implementers, so I’m really excited to see all of the interest on this thread. I’d be more than happy to incorporate any feedback received and present at IETF 120. If reviewing the draft in a meeting would be helpful, please reach out to me directly and I’d be happy to schedule time. Thanks, Brandon [0] https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/security-key-attestation [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acme-device-attest/02/ On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 1:53 PM Prachi Jain <prachi.jain1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I plan to do a POC using this draft and potentially implement it based on the > results. Thus very motivated to get this past the finish line. > > @Mike Ounsworth, I haven't read draft-ietf-lamps-csr-attestation yet so I am > going to give it a read and come back with my thoughts. > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 3:00 PM Mike Malone <m...@smallstep.com> wrote: >> >> It's worth noting that Apple has already implemented this draft on macOS, >> iOS, iPadOS, and tvOS[1]. We've implemented the server side at Smallstep and >> can confirm that there is adoption. That shouldn't stop the evolution of >> this draft, of course, but could help inform it. Adoption is promising and >> it would be unfortunate to see this die at draft. >> >> We don't have any experienced IETF authors here -- not sure what that >> entails -- but we are very interested in the outcome here and would be happy >> to help however we can. To start, I've shared this with a few contacts that >> I know will also be interested. >> >> Mike >> >> [1] https://support.apple.com/lt-lt/guide/deployment/dep28afbde6a/web >> >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:21 PM Mike Ounsworth >> <Mike.Ounsworth=40entrust....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>> >>> At the risk of adding another draft to my plate, I am the lead author on >>> draft-ietf-lamps-csr-attestation, so I suppose it is reasonable for me to >>> volunteer to work on this one also. >>> >>> >>> >>> I wonder if the design of acme-device-attest should change in light of the >>> existence of draft-ietf-lamps-csr-attestation? But I admit to not having >>> read acme-device-attest in a while :/ >>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Mike Ounsworth >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Acme <acme-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Prachi Jain >>> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 6:03 AM >>> To: Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Thomas Fossati <tho.i...@gmail.com>; acme@ietf.org; >>> draft-acme-device-attest.auth...@ietf.org >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Acme] acme-device-attest expired >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you for the update, Deb. I am more than willing to work as an author >>> on this draft and help out :) On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5: 28 AM Deb Cooley >>> <debcooley1@ gmail. com> wrote: I know Brandon has been busy, but I don't >>> know his plans >>> >>> Thank you for the update, Deb. >>> >>> >>> >>> I am more than willing to work as an author on this draft and help out :) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:28 AM Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I know Brandon has been busy, but I don't know his plans for this draft. >>> Maybe his use case has changed? I've cc'd him on this message. >>> >>> >>> >>> Note: acme is a 'working group', to get a draft through the process people >>> have to be willing to work on the draft (vice merely following). Also >>> drafts can certainly have multiple authors, perhaps an offer of helping as >>> an author might work. >>> >>> >>> >>> Deb >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:01 AM Prachi Jain <prachi.jain1...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have been closely following this document as well and would like to know >>> the status of the same. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Prachi >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 1:57 AM Thomas Fossati <tho.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, all, >>> >>> The acme-device-attest draft is expired. >>> >>> Just checking: what are the plans? >>> >>> cheers, thanks! >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Acme mailing list >>> Acme@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Acme mailing list >>> Acme@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Acme mailing list >>> Acme@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
