> Not to steal the chairs' ability to reply.  This draft was adopted by the
> wg in late 2022.  If you take a peek at the history, you can see when that
> occurred.  So the name is correct as it stands.

Yes, you are right. It was adopted already.
It should be draft-ietf-acme-device-attest then.
What I see is a document from an author called "acme"
I can't really understand how this occured.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to