Mike Ounsworth <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Sven. You're talking about removing the entire section IANA > Considerations > Attestation Statement Formats.
> I personally think that's right; in my opinion, this is creating
> maintenance work for IANA that does not really add any value.
I also agree.
I don't understand the claim that the context of use is different.
I was willing to hold my nose, "above my pay grade"
> THAT SAID, this should be a WG decision especially since the current chair
> and authors weren't around for the full history of the document.
> SO, Sven / Ganesh, can you please start a new thread to [email protected]
> proposing that change, and give it half a week to see if anyone complains?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
