http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6251
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |acpi-
| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| |et
Owner|acpi_power-sleep- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Summary|entering/exiting suspend-to-|ec_intr=0 needed to prevent
|ram produces annoying beeps |S3 beeps - ThinkPad X20
|on a ThinkPad X20 |
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-22 19:05 -------
Please verify that I understand this properly:
1. 2.6.15-suspend2 -- does this include the suspend2 patch?
2. 2.6.15-suspend2 already had a broken EC, and got:
> ACPI-0508: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SI_._SST] (Node
d3fc1300), AE_TIME
the default for 2.6.15 was ec_burst=0,
does this behaviour change with 2.6.15 if you use ec_burst=1
(expect beep to start happening, but maybe not)
3. 2.6.16
with default ec_intr=1 you get a beep
with ec_intr=0, beep goes away, but you get an additional delay.
So it looks like the EC may be broken in all 4 cases, just
that it was first noticed and reported when the failure caused noise.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
