http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7880





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-30 03:11 -------
First of all, from ACPI spec 17.5.91, I can get "It is an error for 
NumElements to be less than the number of elements in the PackageList. It is 
an error for NumElements to exceed 255" ,
so getting 8 elements from _PSS package seems reaonable.
Second, "The _PSS list is sorted in descending order by typical power 
dissipation. As a result, the zeroth entry describes the highest performance 
state and the ‘nth’ entry describes the lowest performance state".
It makes sense to eliminate the elements against this rule.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to