http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9624
------- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-30 16:27 ------- Ignore the s2ram issue. Message #10 was wrong, so the observation about s2ram was still with a broken ACPI system. With the patch reverted, the machine is unresponsive to ACPI events. So it's not a real fix. The good kernel responds to ACPI events, properly suspends and resumes, and cpufreqd works. The bad kernel reboots on ACPI events. My test was for rebooting on ACPI events so when it hit the patch that re-enabled them, it appeared to be the culprit. Perhaps I need to bisect from a different direction. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
