http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9957
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
------- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-17 19:49 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dmesg|grep battery
> ACPI: Battery Slot [C1ED] (battery present)
> ACPI: Battery Slot [C1EC] (battery absent)
> It should be clear, that kpowersave (or some backend which it uses) calculates
> this informations wrong,
yes, and it should be fixed by the patch referred in comment #8.
> but I think the new way (if it's not a bug) to show
> each potential battery, unless it's connected or not (and I think I don't have
> an second battery slot ;)) is wrong.
No. In fact, it always works like this. ie. for your laptop, /proc always
reports two batteries.
> It's confusing for me, too, that in /proc/acpi/battery are C1EC and C1ED
> reoported and in /sys/class/power_supply/ C1EB and C1ED. This seems wrong for
> me.
this is really weird, would you please make a double check?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
