http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10124
Summary: Intel SC450NX system stops working with kernels later than 2.6.22.x Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Config-Interrupts AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest working kernel version: 2.6.22.x Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.23.x (haven't yet tested the rc's) Distribution: Debian Sid Hardware Environment: Intel SC450NX system (Quad P3 Xeon) Software Environment: Debian Sid Problem Description: With all kernels I have tried later than 2.6.22.x my SC450NX system hangs a long time at boot with messages like: scsi 0:0:6:0: ABORT operation timed-out. scsi 0:0:6:0: DEVICE RESET operation started scsi 1:0:6:0: ABORT operation timed-out. scsi 1:0:6:0: DEVICE RESET operation started scsi 0:0:6:0: DEVICE RESET operation timed-out. scsi 0:0:6:0: BUS RESET operation started scsi 1:0:6:0: DEVICE RESET operation timed-out. scsi 1:0:6:0: BUS RESET operation started scsi 0:0:6:0: BUS RESET operation timed-out. scsi 0:0:6:0: HOST RESET operation started sym0: SCSI BUS has been reset. scsi 1:0:6:0: BUS RESET operation timed-out. scsi 1:0:6:0: HOST RESET operation started sym1: SCSI BUS has been reset. scsi 0:0:6:0: HOST RESET operation timed-out. scsi 0:0:6:0: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery scsi 1:0:6:0: HOST RESET operation timed-out. scsi 1:0:6:0: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery scsi 0:0:8:0: ABORT operation started scsi 1:0:8:0: ABORT operation started on all scsi ids (in use or not) on two scsi channels. This is alarming enough, but when the system finally starts up, I also find that one of my nic's have stopped working. A quick check at /proc/interrupts shows that there are lot's of differences from the "usual" interrupts. I'll attach /proc/interrupts from both a working and non working kernel, and post dmesg from both. The problem is that with the 2.6.25-rc3 kernel, I can't get the beginning of the dmesg.. Is there a trick other than dmesg -s 65536? Thanks :) Steps to reproduce: -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla