http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10319
------- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-08 08:13 ------- Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tuesday, April 08, 2008 7:41 am Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 02:35:07PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > So, people with a working suspend-to-ram setup (even using the whitelist > > in s2ram, I mean, simply calling s2ram) will discover that 2.6.25 break > > their machine. Removing the s2ram package and suspending with > > kernel-only machinery will work, but... well, it's not user-friendly. > > The assumption that a static table of VBE-based quirks can be used > without paying attention to the capabilities of the video driver has > always been broken, though I'll freely admit that it's all my fault in > the first place... That said, running vbetool from the console after resuming into it with a new i915 driver shouldn't kill your machine... Romano, you say this was working for you before with the suspend/resume enabled i915 driver, right? So something else must have broken? You can run the upstream DRM modules against 2.6.24 to insulate yourself from anything in 2.6.25 that might have broken things... That would be a good data point. Jesse -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
