http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
------- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-25 05:32 ------- OK, I noticed CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG and CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE. Why has nobody suggested their use before? Anywat, I compiled 2.6.25 with these options. This gives me the following detailed log. But unfortunately I did not get everything that's written on the screen via netconsole and I don't have a digital camera. I used 0xFFFFFFFF for debug_level and debug_layer. That was probably too detailed. Maybe other parameters would give a more useful output. I just don't know which. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla