http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448





------- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 05:32 -------
OK, I noticed CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG and CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE. Why has
nobody suggested their use before?

Anywat, I compiled 2.6.25 with these options.

This gives me the following detailed log. But unfortunately I did not get
everything that's written on the screen via netconsole and I don't have a
digital camera.

I used 0xFFFFFFFF for debug_level and debug_layer. That was probably too
detailed. Maybe other parameters would give a more useful output. I just don't
know which. Any ideas?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to