https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16366

           Summary: ASUS ATK0110 causes time keepings - ntp will not sync
           Product: ACPI
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 2.6,34
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
        AssignedTo: [email protected]
        ReportedBy: [email protected]
        Regression: No


After upgrading the kernel from 2.6.28 to 2.6.34 I noticed that lm_sensors was
no longer reporting many things like fan speeds and voltages and some
temperatures.  After doing some research I found that since I was running an
ASUS motherboard that I needed to use the ASUS ATK0110 module.  After
reconfiguring my kernel to include this module lm_sensors worked as expected
but ntp was no longer able to sync the clock on my system and the clock would
drift like it was free running. After backing out the ASUS ATK0110 module ntp
starting working again. 

I use the new PPS support in the kernel with an Oncore UT+ reference clock.  I
don't know if this issue is specific to using ntp with a local reference clock
or if it would also affect ntp using remote time servers.

Also I have been unable to get lm_sensors to function correctly without ASUS
ATK0110 loaded even with acpi_enforce_resources=no or
acpi_enforce_resources=lax.

Is there a work around that will allow both good time keeping and a working
lm_sensors?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to