https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45151


Feng Tang <feng.t...@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |feng.t...@intel.com




--- Comment #1 from Feng Tang <feng.t...@intel.com>  2012-07-30 09:28:48 ---
could you post your acpidump binary?

The commit's logic looks ok, if you revert this patch like this, will there be
some difference? thanks

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
index afbd5cb..36da618 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
@@ -377,10 +377,12 @@ u32 acpi_ev_gpe_detect(struct acpi_gpe_xrupt_info *
gpe_xrupt_list)
                         * Optimization: If there are no GPEs enabled within
this
                         * register, we can safely ignore the entire register.
                         */
+                       /*
                        if (!(gpe_register_info->enable_for_run |
                              gpe_register_info->enable_for_wake)) {
                                continue;
                        }
+                       */

                        /* Read the Status Register */

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to