https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212003

            Bug ID: 212003
           Summary: Regression: Screen ignores ACPI intel_backlight sysfs
                    values greater than 1
           Product: ACPI
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: Linux 5.11.2-arch1-1 x86_64
          Hardware: Intel
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
          Assignee: acpi_ot...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
          Reporter: br@ndonarnold.email
        Regression: No

Created attachment 295535
  --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295535&action=edit
dmesg

In a recent update, the values of
/sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight/brightness no longer correspond with my
screen brightness.

Steps to reproduce:

Change the value of /sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight/brightness to an
integer from 0-255 (where 255 is the max_brightness).

Expected results:

At value 0, the screen is off, and at values 1-255, the screen gradually goes
from dim to full brightness.

Actual results:

At value 0, the screen is off, and at values 1-255, the screen is the same
brightness.

My system: 

My system requires the i915.enable_dpcd_backlight=1 kernel parameter for this
feature to work. But I performed a normal Arch system upgrade to 5.11.2-arch1-1
on 2/21/2021, which has caused the behavior above. My linux version before the
upgrade was 5.10.16.arch1-1. 

I tried many values of the other kernel parameters acpi_backlight but they did
not resolve anything. My hardware is Dell XPS 17 9700 with an NVIDIA Optimus
graphics hardware. The optimus setup uses i915 for the intel modesetting and
nvidia for the main nvidia setting.

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to