https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #64 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Hui Wang:
Maybe, you remember:
>From your first patch proposals there had been two well working setups on here.
+ if (gsi == 1) {
+ trig = ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE;
+ pol = ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
...
and
+ if (gsi == 1) {
+ trig = ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
+ pol = ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
...
And based on your ACPI data analysis, you've taken one of them.
Maybe the other one can make it better for the other systems, meaning some kind
of compromise?
Just waant to add my odd thoughts,
Manuel
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
