For us it was a very simple choice; we needed the ability to run the web server and only ITK provided that ability. Now we have switched to 4D 2003 we were looking at using the web server on 4d client option, but since we would have had to shell out for a web expansion license for each 4D Client we decided against it.So we are now happily using ITK as our TCP/IP layer.
MB ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aparajita Fishman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Active4D Developer Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:21 AM Subject: [Active4d-dev] Survey: which web technology? > Hi all, > > I am very curious to know what TCP/IP layer everyone is using with > Active4D, and why. I would really like to know the factors that lead > developers to choose one web serving platform over another -- cost, > features, etc. > > Any replies would be greatly appreciated! > > Regards, > > Aparajita > Victory-Heart Productions > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.aparajitaworld.com > > "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." > - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoylibrary.com > > _______________________________________________ > Active4d-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev >
