Mehboob, The survey options seem confusing.
We definitely want to replace ITK with 4D's web server, but we're not replacing Active4D.
So I'm inclined to answer "Yes, with 4D's web server", but the 3rd option of "yes, with Active4D" makes me feel like I'm saying i'm replacing ITK and Active4D both.
Because the question is regarding replacing ITK, it doesn't seem appropriate to have Active4D as a choice of a replacement for ITK because it doesn't do the same thing that Active4D does.
4D Internet Commands or 4Ds web server are similar because they deal with the TCP protocol directly.
Active4D needs one of the 3 networking options (4D web server, ITK, Internet Commands) in order to function at all, doesn't it?
I'm going to select 'Yes, with 4D's web server', but please keep in mind it's not affecting the decision to continue using Active4D.
HTH, Randy On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Mehboob Alam wrote:
Please take the time to vote your choices. It would be very helpful towards the development of a market-driven alternative to the current situation. sincerely, m. alam _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
---------------------------------------- Randy Jaynes Management Software _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
