On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Aparajita Fishman wrote: >> It does not say it will do a "next recored([table])" in a "while (not(end >> selection([table])))" loop, just a for loop > > > I may *seem* to work magic at times, but you will have to forgive me for not > being able to magically determine your intention to do a next record() in > this case. My psychic powers must have been below par when I wrote the > continue command. ;)
Thanks for the bashing, I deserved it. I was trying to convey that it was my own stupid fault for not reading the documentation after "...will transfer execution directly to the top of the loop". After rereading my post, I can see where that was not clear. I apologize if I sounded critical, that was not my intent. Steve PS I normally use the for each version, don't know why I didn't this time. _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
