> The only thing I do not like with that approach is, that I have to
> substitute a lot of rowset fields in case there is a related record.
> 
> Well could probably do it within a method or use a pointer to the rowset, if
> that is possible in A4D.

A callback + a column expression can do it, but it sucks. The callback would 
have to see if a query is necessary, and if so save a named selection, query 
the table, then restore the named selection. In either case you would put the 
field values into a collection. Then you would use a column expression to 
retrieve the value from the collection you filled in the callback.

Note that you would have to do the same thing in 4D because of your table 
structure. So you may want to rethink the database design as you said.

Regards,

   Aparajita
   www.aparajitaworld.com

   "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed."
   - Sri Chinmoy   |   www.srichinmoy.org

_______________________________________________
Active4D-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev
Archives: http://active4d-nabble.aparajitaworld.com/

Reply via email to