I completely agree with having two versions. Like a Pro and non-Pro versions.
I have 2 apps that run our company. Active4D plays a major part in these apps, and is worth every penny. It is VERY important to me that Active4D thrives for you because we NEED Active4D. Honestly, we would pay more if it made a difference in the future of the product. It’s that important. But there are times, when I would love to use Active4D for small one-off or small projects where the cost is an issue and we use another solution. 4D falls into this category as well. Todd Freese The Filmworkers Club > On Apr 10, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Aparajita Fishman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> With >> the lower pricing I had 2-3 more licenses I was thinking about purchasing >> between now and June-ish timeline that were just for some real low usage >> stuff I wanted to put a web front-end to. > > I’ll look into making a cheaper version with limited traffic. > > Regards, > > Aparajita > > _______________________________________________ > Active4D-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev > Archives: http://active4d-nabble.aparajitaworld.com/ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://active4d-nabble.aparajitaworld.com/
