On Sunday, 2013-05-19, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On Friday 17 May 2013 19:23:11 Michael Bohlender wrote: > Björn, Kevin, what's your take? Please review the wiki page as well, thanks!
Hi everyone, Bjoern asked me to do the review because he is very short in time. So here are my two cents: * You did collect requirements, not use cases. * Software shouldn't contain "exotic" function in terms of unnecessary stuff. According Kano (and the respective method -> Wikipedia) there are basic functions, performance features, excitement stuff, and features that lead to rejection. Prioritization includes those features and the amount of work. But all core functions (aka basic features) should be available. * I'd recommend to reorganize the bullets. My proposal can be found at top of http://community.kde.org/index.php?title=Plasma/Active/mail (original is below <hr>) * I added some requirements from kmail but don't know how interessting they are because of its technological relation (e.g. authentification) -> marked with ? * I would propose to change some priorities. Have a look for "C -> A", for instance. Cheers, Heiko. _______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active