Is it a big price difference btwn. BigIP and Win2K NLBS?

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ayers, Diane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. März 2002 18:09
An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betreff: RE: [ActiveDir] Clusters - Good or Bad idea?


We've used both the NT 4.0 WLBS and WIn2K NLBS and we gave both up for a
hardware based solution. We went with BigIP.  It gave us a better
solution with more options.  
 
Diane

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Benway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:50 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Clusters - Good or Bad idea?


We are doing this in our current environment. We are using Win2K  load
balance. We have some clusters  and some load balance clusters. Both
work great!
 
Let me know if you would like more details
 
jb

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Clusters - Good or Bad idea?



Hi All, 

I am currently specing out a number of  new file and printers servers
for our HQ with about 700 users (at the moment). I'm considering using
W2K Advanced server to cluster machines. My first questions is, is this
a good idea? Can you load balance across servers? 

Where I am coming from is I want the users at the site, to be able to
connect to the machine(s) with one name using the same disk array. There
could be 4 or more servers in the cluster, if one of the servers fails,
the users get moved over to one of the working machines. Also, can it
load balances itself across the machines. For expandability, if we find
we need more storage or disk capacity, we can just add another server to
the cluster or more disk to the external device? 

Is this possible in a File and Print only environment, or am I living in
a dream world? 


Thanks for you comments 


Jamie Simcox
PC Network Technician
J C Bamford Excavators Ltd


_______________________________________________________________

J. C. Bamford Excavators Ltd.
Registered Office: Rocester, Staffordshire, England. ST14 5JP
Registered No. 561597 England
_______________________________________________________________

The contents of this Email communication are confidential to the
addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient you may not disclose or distribute
this communication in any form but should immediately contact the
Sender.
The information, images, documents and views expressed in this Email
are personal to the Sender and do not expressly or implicitly represent
official positions and policies of the J C B group of companies ("JCB")
and no authority exists on behalf of JCB to make any agreements,
representations or other binding commitment by means of Email.


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to