All that work with Swiss-boy-ardee for that? That's the best you got?

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:11 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
> 
> 
> Theres a lot of room there for all of us.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:33 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
> 
> 
> Bruce is just riding on my coat tails....
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jimmy Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:41 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
> > 
> > 
> > I agree with Martin Tuip.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > /Jimmy
> > --
> > Jimmy Andersson, Q Advice AB
> > Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
> > -------- www.qadvice.com --------
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:18 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I agree on that with you. Windows 2000 has been as stable as 
> > a rock. So
> > besides that and the retiring of the support it should be 
> an easy one.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Martin Tuip
> > MVP Exchange
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> > Roger Seielstad
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:21 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
> > 
> > 
> > To date, I haven't found an instance where NT4 was more 
> > stable than Win2k.
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > Atlanta, GA
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jeremy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:50 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to 
> Active Directory
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't know if this will be of any importance, but I have seen 
> > > several instances where windows 2000 is much more stable 
> than NT4.  
> > > Case in point, I was working for a defense contractor and 
> we had 5 
> > > mail servers(exch. 5.5) and they notoriously went down.  If we
> > > didn't reboot
> > > the servers once a week, they would go down.  We took one 
> > of the lower
> > > tasked servers(500 users) and put it on windows 2000 and 
> > > didn't have to
> > > reboot it for a month and it was still running like a champ.
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger 
> > > Seielstad
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:10 AM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to 
> Active Directory
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Add to that the fact that Exchange 5.5 is end of support 
> at the same
> > > time, and its pretty much a no brainer.
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------------------------
> > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > > Atlanta, GA
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Van Donk, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:46 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to 
> > Active Directory
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Cliff,
> > > > 
> > > > I think that the link below says it all:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > http://microsoft.com/ntserver/ProductInfo/Availability/Retiring.asp
> > > > 
> > > > No more support for NT4 after the end of this year.
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:37 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I am currently compiling information and trying to find good 
> > > > justifications to migrate our Windows NT base network to Active 
> > > > Directory. We are a medium size company. We don't have 
> any direct 
> > > > requirements to implement AD, like we must upgrade to 
> > > > Exchange2000(which requires AD). I can see a few 
> benefits, but my 
> > > > management wants to see quantified justifications. For 
> > example, by 
> > > > migrating to AD you can save 1 hour in setting up a new 
> user with 
> > > > RIS.
> > > > 
> > > > Does anyone know I good website that would show time saved or
> > > > something more concrete and specific than Microsoft's marketing 
> > > > jargon?
> > > > 
> > > > Has anyone gone through a similar experience with their company?
> > > > 
> > > > I would appreciate your insights and advice!!!  Thanks!!!
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Cliff Airhart
> > > > Answer Financial Inc.
> > > > Senior Systems Administrator - Server Support / eBusiness 
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 818.644.4225 We answer to you.
> > > > 
> > > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > > List archive: 
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > > List archive:
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> > > > 
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> > > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > List info   : 
> > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> > 
> > List info   : 
> > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> The information contained in this email message is privileged 
> and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader 
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
> message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
> email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler 
> Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
> email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> 
> ==============================================================
> ================
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to