Larry,
Can you cite where this is coming from so that I can put it
into context? The reason that I say this is because I have other Win2k3
servers that are running RIS that were joined to the domain, and others that
I've upgraded outside of that process. I've had nothing
impacted.
If I can read where you're reading this, I might be able to
clear up what it's REALLY saying, if you know what I mean.
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duncan, Larry Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:50 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [ActiveDir] RIS and Windows Server 2003 Upgrades Hello!
I've just read that "If your network uses RIS with Windows 2000 Server, you should make the RIS server the first computer that you upgrade to Windows Server 2003. You won't be able to use RIS later unless it is upgraded first because of design changes in the way that Active Directory performs authentication."
Can anyone elaborate on this? Particularly to what impact this has had on your Windows Server 2003 migration strategies and exactly what "design changes" caused such an silly mandate.
|
- [ActiveDir] RIS and Windows Server 2003 Upgrades Duncan, Larry
- RE: [ActiveDir] RIS and Windows Server 2003 Upgrades Rick Kingslan
- RE: [ActiveDir] RIS and Windows Server 2003 Upgrades Duncan, Larry
- RE: [ActiveDir] RIS and Windows Server 2003 Upgrade... Rick Kingslan