NLB is loaded by default in Windows 2003. 

Have you ensured NLB is not checked under network properties?

Dennis 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:54 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] After upgrading to Windows 2003

You didn't say why you have NLB loaded.  What's it's purpose? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Irwan Hadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 2:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] After upgrading to Windows 2003

I just upgraded my active directory infrastructure from Windows 2000 to
Windows 2003. For a background, we have two servers working as domain
controller and file server, and one server working as Exchange Server
2000
for about 70 users.

The upgrade from Windows 2000 to Windows 2003 went pretty smoothly, and
here
is how I did that. First, I moved all FSMO roles from the first server
to
the second server, moved all the data from the first server to the
second
server, demoted the first server, rebuilt it with Windows 2003 Standard
edition so that I have clean install.
After that I promoted the first server, transfered the FSMO roles that
the
first one originally had, transfered back the data to the first server,
and
recreated the shared drives.

Both of the domain controllers have the same specs, where basically both
of
them have two network cards, one is Intel 100/S, and the other Intel
1000/XT. I needed to put both network cards on originally, because we
have
two different subnets in the same network. By having the server to
listens
on the two subnets, besides getting better throughput, I can make the
local
traffic to stay within the local network, instead of going to the router
and
coming back again.

After I upgraded the system to Windows 2003, I disabled the second
network
card on the domain controller that handles the RID, PDC, Infrastructure
roles, because when they were running Windows 2000, I always get warning
on
the event log which after I checked at Microsoft site I found that
Domain
Controller that handles PDC should not be multi-homed.

Moreover,  I noticed after I promoted the servers back as domain
controller,
everytime I restart both servers, I got a popup message saying that a
service could not be started, and I should check the event log. After I
checked the event log, I noticed this popup is caused by the following:
---------------
EventId: 7000
Source: Service Control Manager
The Network Load Balancing service failed to start due to the following
error: 
The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because
it
has no enabled devices associated with it. 

For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
--------------

So I went to Microsoft site, and found the following:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=268437
But the problem is the KB above only applies for Windows 2000 Advanced
server.
Furthermore, I also noticed that the registry key that this KB tells I
should delete also exists on my other Windows 2003 box that only has one
network card.

My question is have any of you ever got the same problem like I'm having
above, why it seems only after I promote the server as a domain
controller,
I'm starting to have the popup above. Is there anyway to fix the popup
above? I know that it is not harmful, but I just don't like the DC to
give
popup like that everytime I restart it.

Thanks
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to