I always use the method I described - it ensures that there are no format
incompatibilities.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santhosh Sivarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 2:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Zone Migration
> 
> 
> Thanks for the response.  But I am trying to understand the 
> advantage of
> doing a zone migration using backup and restore method 
> compared to doing a
> Secondary to Primary conversion.  Any thoughts or ideas?
> 
> Santhosh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Roger Seielstad
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 5:55 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Zone Migration
> 
> That's how I've moved zones from NT and Unix servers to Win2k 
> for the last 3
> years. It works very well.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Santhosh Sivarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 6:07 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Zone Migration
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I need help to finalize a DNS design.  Here is the scenario.
> > 
> > NT 4.0 PDC is holding a DNS zone called Mydomain.com.  
> > Unfortunately, I have
> > to use the same Mydomain.com for Windows 2003 AD domain.  It 
> > is a parallel
> > migration.  What is the best way to migrate Mydomain.com to 
> > new Windows 2003
> > machine?  I am thinking about the following option:
> > 
> > 1: Create a secondary zone for Mydomain.com on Windows 2003 
> > machine pointing
> > NT 4.0 PDC as the primary; Change it to the Primary
> > 2: Delete the zone on NT4.0 PDC and create a secondary zone 
> > for Mydomain.com
> > pointing Windows 2003 as the primary
> > 
> > Do you see any problems with this?  Are there any best 
> > practices for doing
> > this?
> > 
> > Thanks in Advance!
> > Santhosh
> > 
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to