>From what I gather if you have run a dcdiag on the server not in the DMZ
and it returns that it does not know of a schema master role holder that
would mean that for some reason the AD has somehow seen that the old
schema role holder as a stale record and therefore deleted it from the
metabase.  So, the answer is yes, you should be able to seize the role
with the internal DC if there aren't existing role holders.

Please anyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Buechler
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)

I have a new HP Prolient coming in, supposed to be here within the next
couple of days. That will be a new DC/File server. I want to introduce
that into the domain first. I will transfer all services and what-not
off the existing file server, wipe it, and install it into the network
as a 2003 stand-alone server. This will be the new 2003 Exchange server.
Once the Exchange move is completed, and all other services are moved
from the 2000 DC currently in the DMZ, I will remove it from the AD,
wipe it, and install 2003 on it to act as an internal apps server. There
are more servers than this in the loop, but I've only covered it from a
DC perspective.

Now, just so I understand, you're saying that I should be able to seize
the schema master role on the internal 2000 DC without it adversely
affecting the server in the DMZ because that server thinks it's been
deleted anyway?

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)


Okay I would say your first step would be to seize the Schema Master
role to the DC on the Internal network before considering anything else.
All the while leaving the Exchange server running in the DMZ, it wont do
much harm that hasn't already been done by it being there.  Meaning, if
the metabase already shows that the record has been deleted than it
seems the server doesn't "know" it's a role holder to anything else but
itself.  Once you have done that it all depends on how you expect to
migrate the data between the existing Exchange Server and the new
Exchange server for your next hurtle?

I'm sorry Frank.  I don't mean to pry the subject, but where do you plan
on finding the system to run the new Exchange server without taking down
the existing server?  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Buechler
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)

Here's the scenario: I am upgrading this shop across the board to 2003,
including Exchange. I want to get a 2003 DC in place before putting
Exchange on a 2003 stand-alone server. To do this, I need to prep the
domain for the new 2003 schema, and I need to do this on the 2000 server
acting as the schema master. Maybe I am looking at this wrong. What do
you think?

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)


Your very welcome Frank.

Yes you can demote a DC running Exchange 2000.  However, I'm not sure
what effect that will have on the Exchange installation.  I would do
this in a test environment before doing that sort of thing in a
production environment.

Just curious, why would you want to do this? 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Buechler
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)

Can I demote a DC running Exchange 2000? I know this is not supported
with Exchange 2003, but I can't find any literature regarding 2000.

Again, thanks for your help Michael (and everyone!)

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)


Yes you should be able to do it without rebuilding anything.  It may
require a domain synchronize to take effect.  But you could force that. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Buechler
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)

Can I do this without having to rebuild the server in the DMZ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wassell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)


I thought I would throw this out there.  

A good option for you may be to use ntdsutil to enter the metabase to
see if there is a tombstoned record in your metabase.  After which you
could delete the old record and manually enter a new record or seize the
role with the internal DC.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Buechler
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)

I've done a little more research.. turns out I missed something. After
running dcdiag /test:Knowsofroleholders /v, it turns out the server in
the DMZ fails. What I get is this:

Warning: CN="NTDS Settings
...blah blah.. is the Schema Owner, but is deleted
Warning: CN=NTDS Settings
...blah blah.. is the Domain Owner, but is deleted

PDC, RID, and Infrastructure Update Owner all passed, seeing the
internal server as the role holders.

I'm still researching this, but I think I'm getting closer the the
problem...

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 8:29 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)


I figured you knew that... Sorry.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 8:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)
> 
> 
> Hmmmmm.... Not a bad idea shipmate.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adams, Kenneth W (Ken) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 6:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)
> 
> 
> Don't you have a desktop PC that you could temporarily use?  
> If not, you
> might want to consider moving your internal DC into the DMZ long 
> enough to move the FSMO instead of the other way around.
> 
> Kenneth W. (Ken) Adams, MCSA, MCSE
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 4:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)
> 
> 
> Wish I could.. Roger had the same idea, placing a server in the DMZ, 
> moving the role, then bringing the server inside to transfer it to a 
> trusted DC. He called it a "swing" server. Great idea, but I don't 
> have another box to do that with.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 2:33 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)
> 
> 
> Have you tried standing up a server in the DMZ next to the Schema 
> Master Server (IE. New server in the DMZ).  Then transfer the FSMO 
> role to new server.
> 
> Just an Idea,
> 
> Todd
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 12:46 PM
> To: ActiveDir (E-mail)
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Moving Schema Master (continued...)
> 
> 
> Greetings All
> 
> If you have been following this thread, you know that I am having 
> problems moving the Schema Master role from a server sitting in my DMZ

> to one sitting in trusted. I have opened up all ports between these 
> two servers, and I am still getting the same error; current FSMO could

> not be contacted. I am really at a loss! I can't seize the role as the

> server currently acting as the Schema Master is also an Exchange 
> server, and is hosting IIS. It is not a server that I can take offline

> and rebuild.
> 
> I have verified that all requisite rights are in place, I have 
> verified replication, I even called the mfgr. (Netscreen) of the 
> firewall to verify that I did indeed have all ports open. I can't take

> this server offline to bring it inside, and I don't have a system that

> I can use as a "swing"
> server as Roger suggested. Is there anything else that may be 
> preventing me from doing this? I am really getting frustrated! (And 
> behind
> schedule...)
> 
> TIA for any help.
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to