RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

[Roger Seielstad]

Title: Message

At least they didn't call MIIS Windows Identify Information Server!     -------------------------------------------------------------- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch You mean like MIIS...   Marchitecture.....  Strikes again.   Todd   From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch   Ahhh geez.  Deal with it, Smart Ass.  They like me here (I think).....  I'm not so sure on the other list.  But then, I don't really care much.  ;o)   I'm just irritated over the near-sighted and obviously lame thought process of the new Microsoft 'Marketing' genius.  Rather than the slick marketing machine of a few years ago, I now get some yutz getting dunked with a water cooler by his office mates because he figured out how to do his job with Office 2003.  Yawn.   Now, I'm getting bombarded by a name that is so bad (WUS) that it deserves the bad press it will get.  SUS was not good.  But, it wasn't obviously dumb.  WUS is the latter - in spades.  So, if I make fun of the name, I'm only like Leno and Kimmel - I'm only riding the crest while it's there....   Regardless, I still like you, joe.    ;0P   Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT, CISSP Microsoft MVP: Windows Server / Directory Services Windows Server / Rights Management Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone WebLog - www.msmvps.com/willhack4food     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Man I ignored that on the other list so you brought it here too....     ARRGHHHHHHHH.   ------------- http://www.joeware.net   (download joeware) http://www.cafeshops.com/joewarenet  (wear joeware)         From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Firstly, it won't be called SUS 2.0.  It will apparently be called the very unfortunate name of WUS - Windows Update Services.  Yes,  jokes have started, and WUS is getting tripped and beat up by all the other software bullies.   However, there is destined to be, as I understand it, an Application Programming Interface for WUS (and, no - I'm not making this up...)  So, now we have the WUS API   As I mentioned on another list, to my knowledge - this is only served with Sushi......   Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT, CISSP Microsoft MVP: Windows Server / Directory Services Windows Server / Rights Management Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone WebLog - www.msmvps.com/willhack4food     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Trent Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch More public info will be forthcoming after this week's Microsoft Management Summit.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios Toronto Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:31 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Where can I find out more information on SUS version 2     Lynden From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:02 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch   I'm running SUS 1.1 quite successfully for about 700 client machines (and servers). SUS 2, which is due in beta within the next 30 days or so, is going to add Office and a few other products for patching, which really is all that SUS is missing.   I prefer the SUS methodology of an agent on the client that pulls down the updates as they are available - we have a lot of highly mobile users so that really makes things work well for us. Things like HKNetCheck require the box be online when you push the patches, which doesn't work well in a lot of environments.   Roger -------------------------------------------------------------- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Cariglia, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch I am in the process of looking at alternatives to distribute/manage Microsoft patches.  We have SUS running in a lab setup and it seems alright.  My question is are there superior products out there that someone has used and can recommend that work well with AD?  Running AD with an empty root and 2 child domains where the users reside, users are either Windows 2000 Pro or XP Pro.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.             Thank You,     Dan